Happy Veterans Day!!!

Posting a little early on this, but I want to say to all those veterans past, present, and future: thank you for what you do and the sacrifices you have made. Thank you to all those fighting in the middle east. Thank you to all that have served and gave up a part of your life to keep this country safe. Thank you to all the POW's, those MIA or not. Your sacrifice has not gone forgotten.

Regardless of how the media, Hollywood, or even those in our own government portray you, you are loved and appreciated. I can't think of any greater sacrifice one can give, but at least four years of your life to serve the freest, greatest nation on God's Earth.

Thank you all!

Could Hillary Be Good for America?

The right in this country has quite a conundrum on their hands. After eight years of a less than popular president and a group of presidential candidates that have flipped on most issues or living like a liberal, the base is not energized for next year’s election. This lack of enthusiasm has resulted in low fund raising numbers, and popular right-wing leaders pushing for a third party. While the primaries might not be over, Senator Clinton has a substantial lead in the polls, and with all the bickering on the right, we may be looking at our next president. But, would that be a bad thing?

Since the day he took office, President Bush has been bashed by the left, and we all feel like we have to stand up for him. The Iraq War, the War on Terrorism, and the illegal immigration debate has been nothing but a fight between bi-partisan groups. The corruption and broken promises of the republican congress have dropped the spirits of much of the base as well. We, on the right, are tired. We are tired of politics and sticking up for a party that gives us nothing in return.

The right isn’t the only ones suffering from all the above. The independents of this country are not only tired of the bickering on topics of the day, they are just tired of the bi-partisan war in general, and this is the group that decides national elections.

America needs a symbol—a person or a thing—to stand behind and get us rallied to defeat the socialistic plan that the far left has for this country. But with a poor selection of presidential candidates and a republican party that spends just as much as a democratic congress, where are we to find it? I think it will be found in the countries first possible female president, Mrs. Hillary Clinton.

We already have an idea of how Mrs. Clinton will govern as president. She has said she will raise taxes, increase entitlement programs, and take profits from successful companies. She has already released the health care program she will push and with a democratic lead congress, she will most likely get it through this time. Do you think this is what anyone on the right or the center is wanting?

Higher taxes will surely throw our country into an economic slant and cause unemployment to rise. Increased entitlement programs will cause more government spending, a higher deficit, and will also have a hand in a rise unemployment. Why should people work if the government is handing out money simply because you don’t have any? Do you think right-winger and independents will enjoy the following?

What about the Iraq war? In her last debate with MSNBC, Mrs. Clinton (as well as Obama and Edwards) said that they would not commit to pulling troops out of Iraq by the end of her first term. While this might not matter to most Americans, since polls are showing more and more support the war in Iraq, but this will definitely not go over well with her far left-wing base.

Do you honestly think that when she takes office, she is going to repeal the wire-tap programs and the Patriot Act? Do you think that Hillary would honest risk a terror attack under her watch, when there hasn’t been one in 9/11 under Bush’s watch? Don’t hold your breath.

Let’s not get too excited though. Mrs. Clinton may be sitting on high poll numbers, making her the shoe-in for the democratic nomination, but she is far from president. Soon she will have to answer tough questions and debate someone with a much better economic and a tougher foreign policy.

She runs the risk of alienating her base and rallying them against her, since she has recently changed her war stance. This might cause the young base to skip election day like they have the last couple of national elections, and don’t forget her 49% negatives. Never before has there been such a polarizing figure running for such a high office.

So while the prospect of another Clinton in the oval office might not be a happy thought in the minds of many Americans, it might be just what we need to get this country back on the right track. Let’s just hope she doesn’t do too much damage while she’s there, but then again, that could also work to our advantage.

9/11 Anniversary

I’m posting this the day after the 6 year anniversary of the most horrendous attacks to ever happen on American soil, 9/11. I, like most Americans I’m sure, spent the day in quiet reflect and prayer for the victims and their families of this tragedy. Many have said that, “There are now 3 distinct shifts in time; B.C., A.D., and Post-9/11.” America was forever changed on that day. We now look over our shoulder. If you are like me, you have an even greater fear of flying. But, mostly importantly, we all realize that some people will kill without good reason, and now radical Islam is a big factor in shaping the future of America.

Unfortunately, there are some that view this as a chance to either profit off the misfortune of the dead, or to berate that country which has been a driving force for the modern world, The United States of America.

Although it is despicable to use the death of anyone to make a profit, I can’t fully fault them for it. These people who use they deaths of 9/11 to create conspiracy theories—which soon turn into websites with subscribers or what have you—are driven not only financially, but mentally as well.

After studying many conspiracy theories (the 9/11 ones, the Free Masons, ect), I have come to realize what drives these people. Happiness. Yes, happiness. These people who come up with these theories typically have too much control over their own lives. They are successful at work or in relationships, but they feel empty. They feel like things are supposed to be this good. Look at Africa, Asia, South America; people are starving and dying of disease. Why do I have things so good, but they have it so bad? It has to be this evil empire in which I live! So they take something like 9/11, and turn it into a conspiracy theory to try and bring some balance to their lives.

But, why do they take their demonstrations to the public morning grounds of ground-zero? So they can get news coverage for their web-sites/book deals? Or, maybe they actually believe it? I don’t what the reasoning is behind such public displays of anger or aggression, but really all comes down to decency. Something of which, I wonder if the Left has anymore.

Then there are those people who hate America. Why? How could anyone hate the country that has liberated more people from tyranny than any other country in the world? We cloth the naked, feed the hungry, give medicine to the sick, and more money to the poor than any other country in the world. We demonstrate the importance of free markets and of individual growth. We teach by example the importance of conservation of resources. And most importantly, we show the importance of a strong political debate in this country. A debate that continues the flow of ideas, but the Left in this country wants to stop ALL OF THAT!

They complain about the war of Iraq that liberated millions of people from the tyrannical hand of Sadam Hussan; they complain about diversity and political correctness; they complain about unfair market prices and our over use of resources, when they have no idea how a market works; they complain about talk radio and other conservatives that are able to get their message out, but none of that matters to them. The only thing that matters to the Left is power and control.

Folks, we have got to wise up. We have got to remember what has made this country great. This is one of the youngest countries in the world and it has pasted up everyone else, and we need to remember how! Most importantly, on the day after 9/11, we need to remember those martyrs that died in those twin towers. Not because they were evil or because they deserved to die. They were killed because they lived in the greatest country this world has ever seen. Don’t push 9/11 out of your heads. It is a stain on everyone’s memory. We need to remember that day, because America will only live on while her people are willing to die for her.

God Bless you and God Bless our troops in Iraq.

Sicko bombo's

I was checking the box office results for the last week shows. Seems that Michael Moore's "Sicko," after 4 weeks, has grossed a whopping total of $15 million dollars. Simply put, that's pathetic. It makes me happy though. It's nice to know that America sees right through this bully socialist's propaganda to not even bother seeing his film.

Way to go America!

Democrats = Cult?

In case you haven't heard, tonight the democratic lead senate has decided to pull an all-nighter debating the idea of withdrawing troops early from Iraq. As a person with religious interests, I have done a little studying in the background of cults and techniques they use to recruit members. One of those techniques is sleep deprivation. It works because you get tried and your problem solving skills go out the window.

The parallels are staggering.

Bush's Legacy

I was getting my hair cut the other day, and my barber asked me "How do you think history will portray President Bush?" In other words, what's Bush's legacy. This honestly got me thinking. Looking at current pissing contest between congress and the president over the Iraq war, it certain that the ordeal in Washington will make better history than the war all together, so that's out. His immigration bill rightly failed.

After a while, I started to think that he would fade in with the rest of the presidents that just held the office without ever really accomplishing anything. But than it came to me. Look at our economy. Look at our unemployment numbers. Look at the stock market. Look at the record low inflation (YES! we have a booming economy with low inflation. Many economists didn't think that was possible). If there is anything that I would look back on and thank President Bush for it is his tax cuts that launched our economy to the point it is at today. The deficit is expected to be 250 billion when he leaves office.

The problem is that the Dems are already talking about repealing the tax cuts to fund their socialist programs. Completely overlooking the fact that the tax cuts have brought in record amounts of tax revenue. Kills me how dumb politicians can be sometimes.

John Edwards Poverty Tour!!

If you haven't heard, the trial lawyer, turned politician has decided to make a tour traveling around the country visiting those Americans who are in "poverty." Now, I'm going to go into the history on how this sleaze of a lawyer made his millions off countless malpractice suits, I really don't think that is necessary. Let's just talk about poverty in America.

Pure and simple: There isn't any poverty in America. None! If I was given the choice of being poor in any country on this planet, it would be this on. This is why:

#Forty-six percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.

# Seventy-six percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

# Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.

# The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)

# Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 30 percent own two or more cars.

# Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.

# Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.

# Seventy-three percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a third have an automatic dishwasher.

Does that sound like poverty? If Edwards really cared about poverty, he wouldn't be touring the United States of America. He would be in Africa or South America; places where there is REAL poverty.

But maybe he needs more help spotting poverty. Let me help. This is the type of poverty Edwards is hanging around. This is real poverty. The difference? About 250 pounds.

Where I've been.

I know I haven't been posting on here very often lately. Been kind of busy on my end. Summer school is keeping me very busy, but with it coming to a close, I will be coming back full force. Get ready!

Paris Interview on Larry King

I haven't been posting much on here due to my tight schedule with school this summer. I have also tried my hardest to steer clear of this Paris nonsense (which is a chore with all the media coverage), but this Larry King interview just threw me over the edge. Here is a little bit of it:



If you didn't watch it, I'll highlight some major points here. First of all, she lied. Flat out lied. I don't blame Larry King for that. He boosts about the fact he doesn't do homework on his guests before shows, plus... well, he has to be at least 115 years old. If you didn't watch the video above, he asked her if she had ever done drugs. She said no. In the video above, after that question/answer, the author showed video footage of Paris smoking pot. Smooth Paris.

Second, this just dumbs down journalism horribly. This interview was laughable. Absolutely laughable. But at least Larry asked her some really tough questions. Lets recap a few:

"Have you ever had a meal with Stalin?"

"I hear there is a city in France your named after. What is it?"

Oh and let's not forget the incredibly intuitive...

"What hotel chain is your family involved in?"

Gore? Peace?

As you might know, Al Gore has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work with global warming. The following is a video of Al Gore during the first Bush Sr. administration. Not only does this guy not deserve the peace prize due to his blatant call for war against Iraq, as of present day, all of this has been forgotten. Gore has blasted the current Bush administration for its policies in Iraq. All the while forgetting about his "pleas" during the Reagan and Bush administrations to look into Iraq. Regardless, he does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.

Celebration! (For Now)

After two votes today, Harry Reid tried push the immigration bill through the senate on to the house. He failed both times. He says that he is pushing the bill aside and moving onto other business. The American people have spoken and our senator finally listened. Well, half of them did.

Immigration Bill Keeps Rolling Along

I have to be honest. I am really, really, really trying to look at this bill objectively. Not because its what's best for this country or anything, but because our president, someone I have stood up for, has put so much bank into this thing. So after many weeks of quiet reflection, I have come to a conclusion that I honestly haven't heard anyone else say: If this bill passes, nothing will change. And this is how I got there:

All of the enforcement provisions in this bill are not going to be enforced. We have these laws on the books now and they are not being enforced. Otherwise, we wouldn't have this problem. There is no reason for them to be enforced, so they just simply won't.

Now for the amnesty part. As it stands, in order for an illegal to get citizenship, the illegal has to pay a fine, go home, learn English, and get to the back of the line for citizenship. There are two reasons why people come to this country illegally: to work or to escape their oppressive governments. In order to work, they don't need citizenship. Just get a Z-visa. And if they came to escape their ex-governments, would they really come forward only to be forced to go home and start a 13 year process? If they do happen to want citizenship, they will not follow these guidelines.

And the Z-visa thing. What is the difference between the Z-visa's and how they are working now? If they get a Z-visa, they have to pay a fine. Without it, they don't. With a Z-visa, they have to pay taxes. Without it, they don't. Starting to see my point? And don't they have to keep a steady job in order to stay in the country on the visa? Some of these illegals stand outside Home Depot and work when they find it. Will they come forward? Sure, without the visa, they are in danger of being deported, but if we actually enforced the deportation laws, we, again, wouldn't have this problem.

And don't forget about those illegals with a criminal record. They are supposed to be deported immediately. Will they come forward?

So its simple. The laws enforcing immigration will not be enforced, and illegals will most likely not come forward for all the reasons I mentioned above. Why would they?

But, don't worry. This thing hasn't made it out of the senate yet, and it's about to fall apart already. And even if it makes it out of the senate, it still has to undergo house scrutiny, and Pelosi does not support this bill.

Now That It Effects Them

While President Bush and pro-amnesty members of Congress are pushing an unpopular immigration “reform” bill that would bestow American citizenship on millions of people who have no regard for America’s laws, liberal Democrats across the Washington region are increasingly complaining about overcrowded houses, noise, loitering and general public nuisance — all caused by illegal aliens...

Listening recently to frustrated folks call a local radio talk show to vent about illegal aliens loitering in front of stores and cramming into $400,000 houses in their neighborhoods, I wondered if those same liberals accused pro-enforcement Americans of being “nativists,” “xenophobes” and “racists” for complaining about the same problems.

Now that illegal aliens have migrated to their neighborhoods, such liberals have become pro-enforcement all of a sudden. Source

Yep, just as I thought. Now that this effects liberals in their own neighborhoods, they suddenly see a problem with illegal immigration. I guess the liberal definition of diversity is "its okay, as long as it doesn't effect me."

Shocking? Nothing shocks me about libs anymore.

Terror Plot on JFK Airport Foiled

Fox News Report:

Authorities arrested three people and were seeking a fourth in an alleged terror plot that planned to blow up a fuel line feeding into John F. Kennedy International Airport that runs through residential neighborhoods, authorities said.

At a news conference, U.S. Attorney Roslynn R. Mauskopf called it "one of the most chilling plots imaginable."

"The devastation that would be caused had this plot succeeded is just unthinkable," she said.

Now, I could go on and on about how blind Liberals are; how Jihad and Radical Islam are dangerous and how we are the center of their cross hairs; how irresponsible someone like John Edwards is for calling the War on Terror a "bumper sticker slogan" and the irony of something like this happening just a little over a week after he said it, but I won't. The proof is in the pudding (as they say).

Of course, I'm sure someone like Ron Paul would probably say we deserved this anyway.

Affleck Comments on Politics

The following is a transcript of Ben Affleck's response to a question Bill Maher asked him on his show. The question was "What did you think of the Democrats now caving in on this Iraq spending Bill, Mr. Affleck?"

His response (edited of course) :

These (bleep) people, you know what it is, Democrats, this is the (bleep) problem with them, because you know how much money I (bleep) give away? The Democrats live in fear of basically, you know, being called cowards, of looking soft on military, looking like (bleep) basically. We're afraid that somebody's going to call us a (bleep), that somebody is going to criticize us, and these people got elected basically on opposing the war, they got sent to Washington to oppose the war, they went there to make a vote on opposing the war. You're either going to vote for or against this measure that says you have to, if you want this money, you have to give us timelines to get out of Iraq. Are you going to be for this or against it? They were afraid that if they basically sent it back to the president and said, "No, we need the timelines," and they left for Memorial Day vacation, that when they left, they were afraid of being criticized. So rather, out of a fear of being criticized, they sacrificed their core political beliefs, and they wonder why people call them (bleep) weak.

Wow! Quite the articulate little scamp ain't he? This is why actors should stay OUT of politics. Unless it is written on a script or on a radical Left-wing website, even they can't make sense of their own convictions.

Fred Thompson "Testing the Waters"

Looks like Fred Thompson is going to throw his hat into the ring.

FRED THOMPSON IS RUNNING for the Republican presidential nomination. In a conference call Monday, Thompson addressed a group of more than 100 supporters and fundraisers whom the campaign has dubbed First Day Founders. He told them that he would be setting up an organization that will allow him to begin raising money and recruiting staff.

Good luck my friend.

Hillary Finally Comes Out!

No no, she's not coming out of the closet. She has finally come out and described her vision of our country.

Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it's time to replace an "on your own" society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.

The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an ownership society really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

That means pairing growth with fairness, she said, to ensure that the middle-class succeeds in the global economy, not just corporate CEOs.

"There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed," she said. "Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."

Hmm... This sounds familiar. I think its called... SOCIALISM. News flash Hillary, its been done. It's been tried, and it doesn't work. France got tired of it and elected a conservative as president. Why is it that libs hold countries like France, UK, and Spain in such high regard for their government structure, but fail to look at whether or not it actually works?

Cindy Sheehan Learns About the Left the Hard Way

Cindy Sheehan--in case you don't know--has been leader of many anti-war rallies and poster girl for the liberal Left due to the fact that she tragically lost her son in the Iraq war. Instead of honoring her son's service, she belittled his valor by leading protests that will bring the troops home from an unfinished job. Is there anything more demasculating than your mommy saying, "You can't do that job. Just quit?" But, I digress. Here is an excerpt from her blog:

The first conclusion is that I was the darling of the so-called left as long as I limited my protests to George Bush and the Republican Party. Of course, I was slandered and libeled by the right as a "tool" of the Democratic Party. This label was to marginalize me and my message. How could a woman have an original thought, or be working outside of our "two-party" system?

However, when I started to hold the Democratic Party to the same standards that I held the Republican Party, support for my cause started to erode and the "left" started labeling me with the same slurs that the right used. I guess no one paid attention to me when I said that the issue of peace and people dying for no reason is not a matter of "right or left", but "right and wrong."

I am deemed a radical because I believe that partisan politics should be left to the wayside when hundreds of thousands of people are dying for a war based on lies that is supported by Democrats and Republican alike. It amazes me that people who are sharp on the issues and can zero in like a laser beam on lies, misrepresentations, and political expediency when it comes to one party refuse to recognize it in their own party. Blind party loyalty is dangerous whatever side it occurs on. People of the world look on us Americans as jokes because we allow our political leaders so much murderous latitude and if we don’t find alternatives to this corrupt "two" party system our Representative Republic will die and be replaced with what we are rapidly descending into with nary a check or balance: a fascist corporate wasteland. I am demonized because I don’t see party affiliation or nationality when I look at a person, I see that person’s heart. If someone looks, dresses, acts, talks and votes like a Republican, then why do they deserve support just because he/she calls him/herself a Democrat?

I have also reached the conclusion that if I am doing what I am doing because I am an "attention whore" then I really need to be committed. I have invested everything I have into trying to bring peace with justice to a country that wants neither. If an individual wants both, then normally he/she is not willing to do more than walk in a protest march or sit behind his/her computer criticizing others. I have spent every available cent I got from the money a "grateful" country gave me when they killed my son and every penny that I have received in speaking or book fees since then. I have sacrificed a 29 year marriage and have traveled for extended periods of time away from Casey’s brother and sisters and my health has suffered and my hospital bills from last summer (when I almost died) are in collection because I have used all my energy trying to stop this country from slaughtering innocent human beings. I have been called every despicable name that small minds can think of and have had my life threatened many times.

While I don't believe in her politics, I feel her pain. She lost her son in Iraq, and it has to be the worst pain possible to bare; burying your child before they bury you. Instead of honoring his memory, she belittled his obvious love of his country by siding with the people on the far Left--people who would never dream of laying down their lives for this great nation. I pray that Ms. Sheehan will dedicate the rest of her life to the family she still has, and one day, realize that some sacrifices are required to life in a country as great as America.

Back From Vacation

Had a tiny weekend away from home, but I'm back now. Will start up posting again very soon.

George Soros' Employee Detained in Iran

In case you don't know, George Soros is the billionaire at the middle of the radical Left movement in this country. Own websites such as mediamatters.com and moveon.org, George Soros uses his power, money, and influence to pull the hypothetical strings of the puppets on the liberal Left. He has set up an organization call George Soros' Open Society Institute which spreads his message of one-world government.

I just saw this on FoxNews.com:

Iran has detained an Iranian-American consultant working for George Soros' Open Society Institute, the latest U.S. citizen connected to a non-governmental organization to be seized in the country, the institute said Wednesday.

This play came so far out of "Left" field, I'm surprised Soros didn't see it coming. George Soros' websites have made it a mission to discredit an republican they can--especially Bush--and portray the war in Iraq as a radical Right-wing conspiracy.

We all know what the Left has been saying. These people are just misunderstood and we should get out of their country to allow them to govern themselves. I wonder if this seizure is just a misunderstanding...

Rush Lays It Out

I make no attempt to hide that I am a Rush Limbaugh fan (thanks dad). I was listening to his show today and he read the following. I almost fell out of my chair after hearing these numbers. Lucky for me, I am a 24/7 subscriber and I can post this transcript here for you:

This is from the website ImmigrationCounters.com, and just listen to these numbers. The number of illegal aliens in the country according to this group is 20,807,645. The amount of money wired to Mexico since January of 2006 is $22,213,000,000. The cost of Social Security services for illegal aliens since 1996 -- are you listening? -- $397,450,739,563 dollars. That's how much we have spent on Social Security services for illegal aliens since 1996, and that spending has been mandated by the courts, and it's only going to go up.

I can tell you personally, the human can not grasp the concept of a billion. I know you might think you can, but you can't; don't care who you are. But not to worry, Rush comes through for us:

The next time you hear somebody use the word billion in a casual manner, keep these things in mind. A billion seconds ago it was 1959. A billion minutes ago, Jesus was alive. A billion hours ago, our ancestors were living in the Stone Age. A billion days ago, no one walked on the earth on two feet. A billion dollars ago was eight hours and 20 minutes at the rate our government spends money.

Nothing really to say, just wrap your head around those numbers and realize two things. You are getting screwed, and your government is doing the screwing.

Iran Plans Attack

You'd have to be an idiot, or just not paying attention, to not know that Iran was going to cause us trouble sooner or later. Well looks like they are going to be a problem sooner than we think.

Iran is secretly forging ties with al-Qaida elements and Sunni Arab militias in Iraq in preparation for a summer showdown with coalition forces intended to tip a wavering US Congress into voting for full military withdrawal, US officials say.

You know, these barbarians might be just that, but they know our politicians and our governmental process better than most Americans. And with the jello-spine democrats that we have as majority right now, militant Islam might get its way.

Source

The Savior of the World!

Look at this picture. This a picture of Al Gore's office at his mansion. He has 3 computer screens (why?), plasma screen on the wall, and all that paper work. Think of how many trees had to be sacrificed for that stack? This is the prophet of global warming and the savior of the earth?

Immigration Bill Passes in the Senate

Edit: Apologizes, I kinda jumped the gun there. The vote today was to approve the start of the debate on the bill, so it hasn't actually left the senate yet. Carry on.

Welp, it happened, the senators in Washington no longer listen to their voters.

The Senate approved a wide-ranging overhaul of immigration laws Thursday, voting 62-36 to bolster security at the Mexican border and to grant many illegal immigrants a path toward citizenship.

American democracy is being flushed down the toilet. This bill was passed without proper appropriations, without budget analysis, and without even listening to the American people.

The only good thing to come out was that at least a majority of GOP members voted against the bill. Of the GOP representatives "23 backing it and 32 opposing. Among Democrats voting, 38 supported the bill and four did not. The chamber's independent Senator voted in favor." Not sure where its going to go from here. Pelosi has said she won't back it unless they have 70 republican votes.

This is insane. I don't care if it's a by-partisan compromise or not, its a bad deal. And the Democrats are trying hard to push this bill while Bush is in office, because it doesn't matter who wrote the bill. When it comes down to who to blame when this deal goes soar (and it will), Bush will be blamed for it. And if he signs this bill, this is what he will be known for. Forget his battle against militant Islam, he gave 15 million criminals amnesty and bankrupted our country.

Source

Finally, They Stand Up To Rosie

Finally, FINALLY! Rosie is almost gone from the View, she starts running her mouth, all three women step in and try to teach Rosie a thing or two. When is she going to be gone?

This Year's Most Frivolous Lawsuit

Honestly....

Jean Gonzalez is suing Little League coach Leigh Bernstein, the New Springville Little League and Little League Baseball and Softball Inc. over an incident in which her son was seriously hurt sliding into second base.

The lawsuit alleges that the boy wasn't taught how to slide properly and that as a result he suffered "serious bodily injury" leaving "permanent scarring and disability." The league and parents have expressed shock and dismay at the litigation.

"I've been coaching for over 20 years, and have instructed players in the various skills required to play baseball, including sliding. Unfortunately, injuries happen. That's part of the game," said Bernstein.

Maybe DHS or Childcare services should step in and take the child away from the parent for allow him to play such a "dangerous" sport.

Source

McCain is Done.

If there is one thing that is certain to come from this bill is that McCain has lost his chance as a Republican President. McCain, at the latest presidential debate on Fox News, declared that he, unlike anyone else on that stage, had been consistent in his track record for voting. He has never flipped-flopped on any issue. I really don't care enough to research whether this is true or not, but one thing is clear, McCain's "voting record" is not a conservative voting record. He votes for spending; he's against the Iraq war; he wants Guantanamo Bay closed; now he want amnesty for millions of illegals, despite the strict opposition from his own party. He may be consistent, but he is consistently confused.

Now, he is getting in arguments with his own party, saying to Sen. John Cornyn: "F--- YOU! I know MORE about this than anyone else in the room!" Who is this guy? He doesn't push his parties agenda; he cusses at his fellow GOP members but works with Reid and Kennedy behind closed doors. Is he a plant from the democratic party? Would make a lot more sense.

Deep Look at the Immigration Bill

I took a day off yesterday to really soak up all the information I can on this immigration bill that is just now being written. I have heard so many people's opinions on this bill and while I am going to heavily comment on this bill, its not etched in stone. This thing can change at anytime. It might not even pass through the senate or the house.

Let's start with the obvious. This is an amnesty bill. Amnesty, by definition, means the forgiveness for breaking a law. A $5000 fine does not cover the charges that could be brought up against these illegals. Not only did they break the law by illegally crossing the border, but most have driver's licenses and filled taxes annually. The only way they could do those things is by having fake documents. If you or I decided to fake tax documents or social security cards, our asses would be in jail for 20+ years. Not these people, so no matter how you look at it, this is amnesty.

Once this bill went into effect, all illegals would have to do is step up and--let's start here--pay a $5000 fine. The average annual salary of an illegal immigrant is $12,000. We expect them to come up with half their annual salary? Than you also looking at the fact that the ACLU will probably step forward and sue to have this fine taken away, saying "Your taking money out of their families mouths." Or something like that.

After paying the fine, they have to either apply for a Z-visa or go home to apply for full citizenship. Let's start with the obvious, they are not going home, period. Most just want to work and don't care about citizenship. The Z-visa, from what I've heard, grants them temporary legal status. The provisions of this visa requires them to have a job and follow the law or they go home.

Okay, currently, we have laws in effect that if someone breaks the law and if during the process of booking them you find out that they are illegal, you are supposed to deport them now. Right now, you have cities that have said they will not turn over criminal illegals, so why would they with this new bill? And the job thing, as it stands, a lot of these illegals don't have steady jobs. They stand outside Home Depot waiting for work. Are they going to go home instantly? Do that, and they come right back across the border.

And about that, there are provisions in the bill requiring more border security. A 730 miles fence, more border control, and others. We have a bill that has already passed saying to put up a 800 mile fence on the Mexican border. We have built 2 miles. Why should we expect the new law to be followed.

Okay, let's say I'm a pessimist and everything works out. Border is secure, these 15 million become citizens along with their families, and become hard working Americans. We now have to pay for the children of these 15 million immigrants to go to school. We will need more schools and guess who gets to pay for that...

What about when they retire? Robert Rector, fellow from the Heritage Fountain, has researched the impact these immigrants will have on our economy. When 9 million of these people decide to retire, it will cost us $2.5 trillion. This will bankrupt our country.

And make no mistake, this will be the end of the GOP. Republicans, as a whole, do not want this bill. There are already a number of republicans who are displeased with their party because of the spending and that's how the democrats won the house and senate. If the republican congressman support this, that's it. Republicans will loose everything, because they are just flat out not listening to their voters. Add that with the fact that two out of three immigrants typically vote democratic, thanks to unions and peer pressure, the GOP is over.

But don't get your hopes up, this hasn't even been written on paper and it getting criticism from all sides of the political battlefield. Not just because of what it says, but because of how this was put together (behind closed doors, totally against procedure). I will be very surprised if this passes.

Terminating Personal Responsibility

Governor Schwarzenegger has come up with a plan to help insure the 6.5 million people in his state who do not have health coverage.

The plan, which Mr. Schwarzenegger estimated would cost $12 billion, calls for many employers that do not offer health insurance to contribute to a fund that would help pay for coverage of the working uninsured. It would also require doctors to pay 2 percent and hospitals 4 percent of their revenues to help cover higher reimbursements for those who treat patients

You read that right, doctors will have to pay 2 percent and hospitals 4 percent to help out people who don't have health coverage. What's next? Taxing teachers for new schools to be built? Taxing cops to help pay for the bullets in their guns? What ever happened to personal responsibility? Why don't these people have health insurance? Can they not afford it, or do they not want to sacrifice to have health coverage? By the way, 1 million of that number is estimated to be illegal immigrants. I thought Schwarzenegger was a Republican. If was a doctor... so long California.

Source

The Worst Idea for Immigration Reform I've Heard Yet

Senators in Washington have finally come to an agreement on immigration reform. This is the basic idea:

The plan would allow illegal immigrants to come forward and obtain a "Z visa" and — after paying fees and a $5,000 fine — ultimately get on track for permanent residency, which could take between eight and 13 years. Heads of household would have to return to their home countries first. Source

Are you kidding me? You actually expect this to work? Let's break this apart.

Illegal immigrants that come forward have to first pay more than $5000 in fines. According to Texans for Immigrations Reform, the average illegal immigrant make $12,000 a year. So, they have to some how come up with half their annual salary... Oh, but it doesn't end there. Then, they have to quit their job and go home; go home... THEY HAVE TO GO HOME?!?! Didn't they come here because they didn't want to live in Mexico? And once they get home, they wait on the incredibly inefficient United States government to file paper work to get the immigrant legal status. Are you understanding now?

Many on the Right are calling this an amneisty program. Yeah, right. This is a joke. They will never come forward, and at that point, we are back at square one. This is almost laughable how pathetic this plan is... but than again, it was spear-headed by Edward Kennedy.

Pelosi Out of Control

After losing a string of embarrassing votes on the House floor because of procedural maneuvering, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has decided to change the current House Rules to completely shut down the floor to the minority.

Amazing right? Nothing against my female counter-parts (I love my ladies), but is this what female leadership is like? They don't get their way, so they drop to the floor and throw a fit? Is this what we can expect from Hillary?

Source

Nutrition Group Sues Burger King

A non-profit (which in of itself is bogus, if you make no money, how can you afford litigation?) nutrition group is suing Burger King for using trans fat. Seems like you can sue for just about everything.

First of all, why is a "nutrition" group suing Burger King? In order to sue someone, I thought that someone has to effect you directly. So, why are people that strive for nutrition eating at Burger King? If they don't eat at Burger King, why are they suing? Preach about the dangers of trans fat and let the consumer decide where they want to eat; don't decide for them. Beside, isn't it possible that someone that eats at Burger King regularly might like the trans fat?

Second and most importantly, are these people so helpless, or do they think that people who dine at Burger King are so helpless that they need to sue a corporation to protect somebody? Who assigned this group to be the nutritional 'babysitters' of America?

What's next? PETA suing zoos for having locked up animals? Source

Because They Hate

I've said this before, in the aftermath of 9/11, Liberals (and now Ron Paul) believe we should sit down and think "Why do they hate us?" Well, I'm going to answer that question and prove that its not just us they hate.

I've documented several cases where Islamic fascists have killed in the name of Allah in several other countries. And now, Al-Qaeda has threatened France for voting in a conservative president.

So why? Why do they have so much hate? It's because we promote freedoms to people that contradict what Islam is based on. We--conservatives, they do not libs--promote freedom of religion, freedom of the individual, freedom of women and other races, but most of all, we are not afraid to fight those who oppress the freedoms of others.

"You said they don't hate Libs!" Correct, libs are weak. Libs go out of their way to try to appease these fascists. Why would they hate someone that is afraid of them? Libs are empowering this radical religion. Libs are working to bring our troops out of their land, Islamists are happy for this. Make no mistake though Libs, if you get rid of us conservatives, the Islamic militants will not go away. Libs promote feminism and gay marriage. You think Islamic fascists are going to let that slide? They are being nice to you for now because you are helping them, and when they no longer need your help, you will be in the sites of their AK's.

So why do they hate us? Because... now can we rid the world of these barbarians?

Quite the Woman!

I was reading an article on about.com from the Liberal Politics section and the columnist there was raving about a Hillary commercial she just saw. Saying things like "Holy cow!" and "I'm flabberghasted that a big-gun ad that powerful is being unleashed so early." This got me curious. What in the world was she talking about? She linked this video at the end and, I'm sorry, I died laughing.

In the commercial, it has her husband, Bill Clinton, singing her praises. Are you kidding me? This is the front runner for the Democratic party? This is her big gun, her husband? I thought she was a strong, independent woman. You feminists and women's rights folks should be "flabberghasted." This isn't an independent woman, this woman has been dinning off her husband's left-overs for years. I've posted this before, but its worth repeating:

Hillary speaks out for children's rights; saying that children, baring any mental disabilities, should be able to make their own decisions in life without be held down by their parents, yet when her daughter, Chelsea, wanted to get her ears pierced, mommy said no.

Hillary is in heavy favor of teachers unions and public schools, but sent her own daughter to a private school while Bill was in office.

Two weeks after Bill Clinton became state attorney general of Arkansas, the "self-made, can stand on her own two feet" Hillary got a job at a prestigious law firm in Little Rocks. Two years later, when Bill became governor, she made partner. Way to stick it to the man, you go girl!

So, is this the future leader of our nation? Can we expect for Hillary to seduce interns? Or is this just Bill Clinton's attempt at 8 more years in the presidential office?

Completely Oblivious Liberals

I'm making a long list of single words that describe Liberals, and I just found another! Liberals have got to be the most oblivious group of politicians in Washington. Example: Gun Control. No matter how many facts you give them proving that gun laws, when tried, only raise crime and/or murder rates, Liberals will just look at you and say "Gun are bad, m'kay." Taxes are another.

I'm going to spell this out first. Tax cuts work! Raising taxes does nothing but hurt our economy (which some might argue that that's what Liberals want), and here is how. Raising taxes always hurts the rich. Liberals wouldn't have it any other way. So any money the rich make, goes mostly to taxes. Tax cuts come in and they have all this extra money. Now rich people are rich for a reason, they are smart with their money, so they take all this extra money and invest it! Investing into American corporations which increases jobs (which our country has a 95.5% employment rating right now) and causes us to grow. But, don't worry, they still have to pay taxes on dividends. Our government just took in a record amount of tax money. So, taxes are cut so the rich have more money to invest, jobs are created getting more people off welfare, and the government STILL gets their money. IT WORKS! I love things that work.

But, Liberals won't be fooled so easily. Obama is already talking about raising taxes. I just don't understand these people. You give them the facts and they turn their nose up to it and continue pushing their failed programs. Oblivious or insanity?

Cooking the Books to Support Cooking of the World

I have never been one to talk too much about the Global Warming hysteria that is sweeping across our nation (at least not here on my blog). Normally, I am a person who just LOVES to debate. I try to informed on most topics that interest me just in case I run into that person on the street that wants to "throw down." But Global Warming nuts, well they just don't offer any sort of a challenge to me. The science is not there. You can not scientifically back up man-made global warming, you just can't. So debating this topic is much like trying to debate 2 + 2 = 5. No matter how much you scream it, its just never going to be true.

But never the less, my dad sent me this article. To paraphrase, it basically talks about how scientists and Al Gore (never lump him in with the scientist category), in the early stages of this hysteria, were "cooking the books" in order to promote this hair-brained theory.

Like I said, this topic is getting too easy. Kinda like Liberalism.

Al-Qaida Threatens U.S.

In case you haven't heard, three U.S. troops have gone missing after a fire fight in Iraq last week. After a restless search for the missing soldiers, we find out where they are.

Today, Al-Qaida "front group that claims it has captured American soldiers warned the United States on Monday to stop searching for them... 'What you are doing in searching for your soldiers will lead to nothing but exhaustion and headaches. Your soldiers are in our hands. If you want their safety, do not look for them,' the Islamic State of Iraq said on a militant Web site." There you go. Straight from the horses mouth.

Now, two points. First, this proofs that Al-Qaida exists and this is a blatant threat to us and our troops. Remember the last time Al-Qaida abducted troops? We found them several days later mutilated beyond recognition, in the middle of the road, with a bomb between their legs, dead. The search for these three patriots can not be called off, because, chances are, they are dead already.

Second: Hasn't the Liberal media been saying that Al-Qaida isn't in Iraq? Open mouth, insert foot?

More Islamic Violence in Thailand

Pattani, Thailand - Separatist insurgents on Monday shot dead a Thai-Buddhist couple working as fruit pickers in the majority-Muslim area of Bannang Sata, Yala provine and injured their three-year-old daughter, police said.

All of this happened in front of the 3-year-old girl. I don't care how old you are, something like that will remain implanted in the back of your mind for the rest of your life.

Funny, I don't hear the Liberal media talking about this anywhere. When are you going to wake up America? When are you going to realize the threat that Islamic fascists impose on our world? They already killed 3000+ Americans on 9/11. They already constantly launch attacks on our allies (Israel). They already continually kill their own people. What's it going to take? These are not people who need "understanding," we don't need to sit around and ask ourselves "Why do they hate us." We need to first realize that they hate us! And second, that they want to kill us! To hell with "why!"

Source

And Their Off!

Are these two entities in a race to be the most hated?

President Bush's Approval Rating: 34.4%
Democratic Congress Approval Rating: 37.5%

The President's approval rating has been low for a while. Congress has only been in office for 5 months and they are closing in the gap. I guess the Democrats will be damned before the President shows them up on anything.

Keep up dated on this monumental race here.

Interesting/Thought Provoking Facts

America's oil consumption and demand has gone up roughly one percent a year since 1976. Ironically, this is the same year that the last oil refinery was built.

Kind of interesting. We are a country who's entire economy would fall if we stopped receiving oil, yet we have not build a new oil refinery in 31 years. Oil companies like to blame this on environmental groups. This might be true a certain extent, but appeasement of these groups should be low, low, LOW on the list of our government's and oil companies' priorities.

We need to become energy dependent and we need to tell these environmentalist groups to either become part of the solution or back off.

Free Speech or CBS Under Fire?

Everyone in the entertainment industry knows, radio is the last outlet for free speech. Every other outlet of media has been under scrutiny for saying or doing something offensive, but CBS seems to just enjoy caving into political correctness and for firing people who someone might find offensive.

Everyone knows about the Imus situation. Imus was fired from his CBS funded morning show for calling the Rutger's female basketball team "nappy headed hoes." But, it doesn't stop there. Friday, CBS fired two radio shock jocks for making a prank phone call to a Chinese restaurant and pocked fun at Asian stereotypes (read the full article here, but let me say this. One of this jock's wife is Asian).

Now CBS is in another situation, and if they are consistent they will fire two more radio jocks. XM Radio's shock jocks Opie and Anthony are caught up in a controversy after having a guest on their show who repeatedly talked about raped and beating Condoleezza Rice and Laura Bush.

Is all this the result of talk radio and other radio shows under fire for abusing free speech, is this CBS caving into the pressure of the PC cops, or is CBS trying to gain publicity from all these controversies? I would be inclined to lean toward the first option, but since all this has happened to people on the CBS payroll, I think its too early to say.

Oxycontin Scandal

Oxycontin, in case you didn't know, is a very strong--yet effective--pain killer. This is a drug that is strict limited by prescription, but was widely prescribed due to it's effectiveness. As of Friday, "Purdue Pharma L.P., its president, top lawyer and former chief medical officer [have been ordered to] pay $634.5 million in fines for claiming the drug was less addictive and less subject to abuse than other pain medications." None of these men will see an ounce of jail time.

Many believe they should receive jail time, comparing them to typical street side dealers. This is not a just representation, no jail time for these gentlemen is needed because their drug--from what I heard--did work and all drugs--over the counter or prescription--have side effects of some type. But this $634.5 million dollar fine isn't nearly punishment enough for this $10 billion company. Personally, this company should be charged to pay for any individuals suffering from this drug, which they undoubtedly will once all the trial lawyers get to working.

One final point though. I make no attempt to hide the fact that I'm a Rush Limbaugh fan. I'm actually a 24/7 insider and highly enjoy all I get from the service. In the mid 90's, Mr. Limbaugh came out on his radio show saying he was addicted to pain killers. What pain killer? Oxycontin. Is this an excuse? Maybe, maybe not, but it does prove that he is merely a man. A opinionated man with a big mouth? Yep, but a man nonetheless.

Source

Tony Blair Steps Down

In a shocking move (not sure how shocking, I am, after all, not British), Tony Blair has decided to step down as Prime Minister of the Labour Party in the UK. I don't know the full story. I don't know what his approval rating in UK was (it has to be higher than Bush's). I don't know what pressure he is receiving from his people and constituents. I don't know what he personal life is like. His stepping down could be justified, but since I haven't heard any of these, I'll go with my gut feeling.

I respect Tony Blair. If he is being forced to step down because of his involvement with the Iraq War, I feel more sorry for him than I probably should, but, I have to say, I am glad he is not the leader of my country.

Look at how Tony Blair handled the 6 sailors that were captured by Iran situation. They had the proof that they were no where near Iranian waters. This was an act of war! But, what does Blair do? He asks them to play fair. He could have rallied the world behind him, mounted up the forces, taken his troops back, and horse whipped it's leaders in shape. But instead, he goes to the UN and plays that BS game. Spineless, to say the least.

The leader of any country has to be one that, when faced with pressure of foreign governments or his own people, needs to stand up to his critics and remind them what's at stake. The UK isn't alien to terror attacks. They have had their own attacks, people have died, and they know what's at stake in Iraq. At least they used to know. Just like our country now, the Liberal media and others opposed to the war are now fueling the public with tails of lose and death from Iraq. Stand up for what you know is right, not for what the media or your critics, the people who don't want you in office anyway, thinks you should be doing.

I'm happy we have a leader willing to saddle up and ride that horse to the end. I'm happy he isn't playing nice with the Democratic congress (who has an approval rating matching the Presidents). I'm glad that this man wants to fight these monsters and bring an era of peace back to this world.

On a final note, Tony Blair, I am happy you stood by us as long as you did, but if you are tired of this war you did the right thing. I guess it is just time for someone else to take the reins. Let's just hope you didn't step down so a Liberal socialist could take over and botch everything up.

Obama Pulls a Bush?

Barack Obama, caught up in the fervor of a campaign speech Tuesday, drastically overstated the Kansas tornadoes death toll, saying 10,000 had died. The death toll was 12.

Two things about this I want to point out. First, Obama got and/or said this information from some where. Is trying he trying to put this on the same scale as Hurricane Katrina so that it will have equal importance when Bush is blamed for this natural disaster? Or is he just ill-informed?

Second, I have not heard anything about this on the major news stations. Every time Bush says anything that doesn't make sense or displays the smallest appearance of being tongue tied, his intelligence comes into question. But when Obama, the Liberal golden boy, makes a mistake, the media shrugs it off or doesn't even mention it. Whatever happen to the by-partisanship of the media?

Source

Illegal Immigration Video

This is a great video showing the numbers of growth when it comes to illegal immigration. It really puts this into perspective of what our population will look like if we don't control this problem.

Again Democrats = Childish

There are so many things I can say about this article, but I find myself speechless. You have to be blind not to see how bitter and whiny the Left is. So all I'm going to do is just post the article.

Pelosi Threat to Sue Bush Over Iraq Bill

Obama's Political Tactics?

One of the key points I have brought up against all of the Democratic presidential candidates is that most of them don't nearly have the political credentials of their Republican counter-parts. This isn't more evident in any of the Left contenders as in Barak Obama. This guy hasn't been a senator for more than 3 years and he is already thinking he can carry the Democratic ticket. The worst part about this candidate is based on his lack of experience, you don't know what type of president he will be. Well, I think we found out.

In this Wall Street Journal article Barak Obama "called a government-industry bargain: Auto makers would get some federal assistance for their crippling retiree health-care costs, in return for producing more fuel-saving hybrid vehicles."

So, is he going to use government money to persuade corporations to fill his agenda? It's bad enough he is towing the environmental line, but he is resorting to blackmail? Pathetic.

Global Warming the Religion

Despite what anyone says, Global Warming has become a religion. It has all the characteristics of a religion. Its meant to save people; sets standards for how we live; gives us a way out of our sinful (in this case polluting) nature; most of all, it has a profit at the center, Al Gore.

I have posted enough here for today, but I really wanted to bring up this point: Separation of Church and State.

If we are supposed to separate God out of the equation when making any decision for our country, why is Global Warming--a religion--such a hot topic for the Democratic party? Hypocritical, ignorant or the beginning of a new age religious movement? You be the judge. I'm going with ignorant.

UK Schools Are Forced to Diversify

In an article by Telegraph.co.uk, schools in the UK--private and public--are now being forced to "promote race relations or close." Christian, Jewish, and even Muslim schools are being instructed to create relations with each other in order for the children to understand one another.

Sounds good right? So why do I post this? Because the pressure of the situation is not being put on the Muslim schools (because their aren't any), the pressure is being put on private Christian schools. The government is now stepping in and telling these private schools, that receive no money from the government, are being told to open their curriculum to Muslim subjects in order to diversify, and if they decide not to, the government will shut them down.

Where is the since in all this? Why does a private Christian school--private means you have to pay a lot of money to put your kids in that school and you only send your child there by choice--have to accommodate for anyone at all? It is a private school before it is a Christian school. If you don't want your kids to be taught in a Christian environment, don't pay the extra money to send your kids there. This is just another way the socialists and the liberals are trying to make good with the Islamic Fascists in the middle east. Do enough good deeds and they may not kill you. I have never seen a more cowardly group of people in my life.

Source

Socialist Call for Riots in France After Defeat

Is this a few a the future for the American election in '08? Female, socialist candidate was defeated by a male, conservative candidate in the French presidential election on May 6. After being defeated, the socialist opponents called for riots in the streets over the voter outcome.

This is unbelievable. Now we can add childish to the list of descriptive words for Democrats, because, in case you didn't know, Liberals want a socialist government in America, they just have a different name for it.

Source

American Progress Held Back By Environmentalist's

I have become more and more disillusioned by the environmentalist movement every time I open my eyes to get out of bed in the morning. Every time I turn around, these apocalyptic morons are not only using scare tactics to govern how we live, but holding the progress of our great nation back by suggesting inefficient tactics to save the environment.

Take this article in the Wall Street Journal. Kris Hudson and Rebecca Smith wrote that Wal-mart has decided to go green. Installing solar panels on 22 stores in California and Hawaii. Environmentalist love when corporations use solar panels. Sure because it's a safe source of energy, but for another reason. The cost of these solar panels outweighs the money that it saves in energy, thus crippling corporations that use them. Just ask yourself, if solar panels are so effective, why don't environmentalist groups use them on their headquarters. Why don't Hollywood environmentalist's use them on their houses? Thankfully, Wal-mart has decided to test the theory before going national.

But how does this hinder progress? Because first of all, crippling companies that waste money on energy efficient fairy tales will not grow, thus no new jobs, products, ect. But that's not the biggest way they stomp on American progress. Nuclear power is proven to be a clean/renewable energy source. France is almost completely nuclear and they have so much left over energy, they are selling it to other countries. But, environmental movements have protested the research of nuclear power in the US because it's not natural.

Now come on, we use natural energy and we are either wasting money (solar), killing birds (wind), or killing the environment (oil). We try to find a renewable and clean power source and it's not natural enough. Can you people be pleased at all?

And no, nuclear power is not dangerous. Not one person has ever died from nuclear power in the United States. And don't forget that while China and other countries continue to drill for oil in our waters (yes, China is drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico), our country is beginning to fall behind other industrial countries because we continue to tailor our ways to these anti-America environmentalist groups.

France Elects Conservative President

In one of the most surprising moves I have ever witnessed, France elected Conservative Nicolas Sarkozy as President of France. Having one of the biggest voter turn outs in the last 40 years, soon-to-be President Sarkozy won with a 53% majority.

Soon-to-be President Sarkozy has vowed to change France's 35 hour work week, change immigration policies, and reopen friendly relations with the US. Let's all hope that this is a President that will stand up with America and Britain in the fight against terror. Or that he will at least stay true to his word and bring France out of it's socialist state.

Source

Can You Say Oxymoron?

Through my study and readings on the Democratic party, I have come across one of the most mind numbing concepts to hit me and my involvement in politics. Its a term known as the Conservative Democrat.

Here is a blog of one such individual with this mission statement:

The purpose of this site is to give a voice to long overlooked mainstream Democrats. For too long, the views of Democrats who are populist on economic issues and traditionalist on social issues have been ignored by the Democratic Party. Our goal is to rebuild the moderate-conservative wing of the Democratic Party and create a new Democratic majority based on concern for working families, common sense and mainstream values.

I'm currently reading Bernard Goldberg's "Crazies to the Left; Wimps to the Right," and in the first chapter of his book, he talks about his upbringing. Long story short, he grew up a steadfast Liberal Democrat and, through his experiences in college, CBS (where he worked), and general life, he converted to conservatism.

What I'm not understanding is this. The principals he described as a Liberal were, ironically, also conservative view points. His main concern was that he thought conservatives were racist. Conservatives, mainly those in the south, did not want the Civil Rights Act to pass (History lesson. Senator Robert Byrd, long time Liberal Democrat representative of West Virginia, voted against the Civil Rights Act, saying, "[I would] never submit to a fight beneath that banner [the American flag] with a Negro by my side."). Later, Mr. Goldberg changed his ways when he saw how CBS reported news with a Liberal slur and after the Liberal bashing of troops in Vietnam (Can you say Deja Vu?).

While I have no problem with the Democratic party having a conservative side, it makes me wonder how these individuals would vote. Would they vote based on their personal convictions, or would they vote based on their loyalty to their political party?

Those that vote based on their personal convictions, I applaud you. I wish the Democratic party had a Conservative candidate or two. It would make voting a little more interesting.

For those of you voting based on your loyalty, let's talk. The Democratic party is no longer the party of JFK or Thomas Jefferson. That Democratic party is gone. The Democratic party of today is one build by George Soros and the Radical Left. A vote for the Democratic party is not a vote for freedom, but one of socialism.

I don't want to tell you how to vote, just this. Politicians can change their principles, and you can't stop them. But you don't have sacrifice your principles to keep them in office.

Times 100 Most Influential People

This past issue of the Times has featured the world's 100 most influential people in the world. On the list are some people who are actually large influences in the world, in both negative and positive way. Let me say, I don't care at all who the Times believes is influential or not. The Times is a left leaning magazine for people who look up to Fidel Castro, a man who kills is own people for thinking differently. But this year, things are a little out of hand and down right sick.

Let's start out by saying who wasn't on the list. Our president, George W. Bush, failed to make it on the list of most influential people. It doesn't bother me that he wasn't, except for the fact that Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton were on the list. Two people who's political experience can be put on the back of their business card made the list, but the leader of the free world didn't.

Oh but it doesn't stop there. George Clooney, a man whom I haven't since the turn of the year, made the list. Rose O' Donnell, a woman who professes her hate for Bush, the troops, and thinks that 9/11 was a government hoax, made the list. Heidi Klum, the model turned cocaine addict, made the list. What a great bunch of influential people for our children to look up to.

Let's name a few who didn't make the list. Sean Hannity, an individual with a national TV show and a syndicated radio show on more than 500 stations, didn't make the list. Rush Limbaugh (do I need to describe him) didn't make the list. That's just a few.

That's not the most appalling part. Osama Bin Laden made this list. This is just flat out sick. The leader of a terrorist organization who lead an attack on America that resulted in the death of more than 3000 citizens gets mentioned in this magazine.

Is this unbelievable or am I loosing my mind? I have heard of Bush hating, but ranking a man that is responsible for countless deaths above a man that is working to rid the world of this murdering bastard is simply absurd.

Democratic Sell Out

Sell out can know be added to the long list of negative traits for Democrats. In case you haven't heard, George Tenet--former head of the CIA--is selling out President Bush in order to sell books. According to MSNBC,, "[d]irector George Tenet’s new book reveals sobering details of how the United States went to war with Iraq based on faulty intelligence and political opportunism."

To understand the travesty of this, let's back-track and examine who George Tenet is and what he did.

George Tenet was head of the CIA. For those of you who don't know, the CIA is our foreign intelligence branch of our government. The CIA's job is to spy, gather intel on other countries in order to keep us safe. Which means, the "faulty intelligence" President Bush used as a basis for going to war in Iraq was present to him by (you could see where I was going with this a mile away couldn't you) George Tenet.

Oh it gets better. Guess who appointed George Tenet the job. Bill Clinton.

Bush has made many mistakes in office. His major mistake, trust. He trusted the attorneys of the Clinton Administration and allowed them to keep their job. Seven of the get fired and you have this Alberto Gonzales controversy. Now, you have an appointee of Clinton who gave the President faulty information, which our President used to start war. Now that same appointee is going to write a book about the President trusted him with the faulty information he gave.

Is anyone else just dumb-founded by this?

John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) Calls for Impeachment

Democratic congressman John P. Murtha is using a word we are all familiar with: Impeachment.

Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) said Sunday that Democrats in Congress could consider impeachment as a way to pressure President Bush on his handling of the war in Iraq.

“What I’m saying, there’s four ways to influence a president. And one of them’s impeachment,” Murtha, chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee, said on CBS’ Face the Nation.

Amazing isn't it. The Democratic congress has done nothing since taking office accept attempt to raise our taxes and undermine our troops. Now, they are attempting to weaken our country even more by impeaching the our president. The same president that wants to fight terrorists, bring freedom to Iraq, and protect our country.

Mistakes were made in Iraq. For instance, our country shouldn't have waited on the UN. After presenting our case to the UN, they decided to takes months debating and putting together mandates for Sadam that he never followed. When the UN finally decided to send inspectors, Sadam wouldn't let them look every where they needed and he eventually kicked them out. During these months of debates and typical UN 'BS', Sadam had plenty of time to dismantle and hide his weapons.

Do Democrats call for impeachment of the inefficent UN officals? No, they call for the impeachment of the one person who is willing to fight these terriorists and protect our country. Traitors to our country. All of them.

Goldberg's New Book. Can It Expose Hillary?

Bernard Goldberg--author of Bias and 100 People Who Are Screwing Up America--has written a new book in which he slams Hillary Clinton and calls her out on her blatant hypocrisy. This is nothing new, I think. Many people know about the hypocrisy she leads in her live. It astounds me to think that anyone would vote for such a two-faced shrew.

If you don't know anything about Mrs. Bill Clinton's long list of hypocritical behavior, let me help you out by naming a few:

Hillary speaks out for children's rights; saying that children, baring any mental disabilities, should be able to make their own decisions in life without be held down by their parents, yet when her daughter, Chelsea, wanted to get her ears pierced, mommy said no.

Hillary is in heavy favor of teachers unions and public schools, but sent her own daughter to a private school while Bill was in office.

Two weeks after Bill Clinton became state attorney general of Arkansas, the "self-made, can stand on her own two feet" Hillary got a job at a prestigious law firm in Little Rocks. Two years later, when Bill became governor, she made partner. Way to stick it to the man, you go girl!

I could continue, but I'll leave you with one word: Whitewater.

Even the French Hate the French!

In a word: Amazing! I knew I hated the French, but the French hating the French?

The French dislike themselves even more than the Americans dislike them, according to an opinion poll published on Friday.

The survey of six nations, carried out for the International Herald Tribune daily and France 24 TV station, said 44 percent of French people thought badly of themselves against 38 percent of U.S. respondents who had a negative view of the French.

I know Libs--one might call them some sort of an American--hate America. They might not come out and say it, but they do. They hate our economy, conservatives--which, based on the last presidential election, is half the country--, the pollution we create, the wars we wage, and the people we have 'wronged' in the past. All that combined, yes, they hate the US. But you'll never hear them say it in public.

I'm kinda surprised the French did it.

Source

Islamists Take Their Hate Further

Islamists have killed again. I know, what your thinking. What's new, right? Terrorists who kill in the name of Allah are a dime a dozen where are troops are. This interesting--I say interesting not because I enjoy death--because this time, the deaths are not happening in Iraq, America, or even to American citizens. This is happening in Thailand!

Here's the story

Three men have been shot dead in Thailand's restive Muslim-majority south as the kingdom marks the third anniversary of a mosque massacre, police said.

A 45-year-old Muslim man was killed in a drive-by shooting and another 37-year-old Muslim man was shot by suspected Islamic rebels in an ambush in Narathiwat, one of three troubled provinces bordering Malaysia.

Now, this is tragic. No matter how you look at this, the deaths of those people require morning and the fact that I have to use their deaths to prove a point to you Libs sickens me. But, it must be done.

Liberals seem unable to grasp the fact that Islamists hate us, and want to kill us. Even after 9/11, when, before our very eyes, 13 Islamic fascists felt the need to fly planes into buildings and kill 2000+ of our citizens, the Liberals were telling us to ask ourselves, "Why do they hate us?" Well as you can see, not only do they hate and kill us, they also hate and kill Buddhists and the own brethren--the Muslim community.

So why do they hate everybody? I don't know. Maybe its because we have grown more as a country in 200 years than they have in 10 centuries. Maybe--more likely--we are of different religions.

There could be several reasons, but thats not the point. These Islamic fascists want us to submit or die. And the 'us' is no longer just tailored to the United States. 'Us' now means everyone that is not Islamic. You Libs need to wake up. You can not bargain with a religion that teaches it's children to kill in the name of a god. The war in Iraq and the war on terror MUST be won.

BlackAndRight Says It All!

An individual with the handle 'BlackAndRight' posted a video on youtube.com about his views on the war. Words can't express what he said. Watch it yourself.

Fighting an Enemy Abroad and at Home

In the wake of the 9/11, everyone knew that things were going to change. We had been attacked on our own soil, thousands of our citizens had died, and we were determined to take the fight to enemy. Thank God we had a commander-in-chief that was willing to do so. Little did we know that 6 years later, we would be fighting our enemies allies in our own legislative branch of government.

Today, they (Democrats) did it again. Source. Also on CNN.com

Defying a fresh presidential veto threat, the Democratic-controlled Congress will pass legislation within days that requires the beginning of a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq by Oct. 1 and sets a goal of a complete pullout by April 1, 2008, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday.

Amazing isn't it? Our Democratic Congress (I say 'our' because they do represent me as much as I hate to say it), despite the threat that Bush WILL veto this bill, went ahead and did it anyway. Either they are just completely stupid or they are intentionally trying to delay funding to the troops. If they are stupid, they shouldn't hold office; if they are delaying funds, they are--say it with me--traitors.

Now, I know what you Libs are thinking, "Bush doesn't have to veto. If he signs off on it, the troops get their money. It's Bush's fault."

Let me explain something to you. The Democrats are calling shots that are not theirs to call. You say they are putting in a pull out date because they care about the troops. Who cares. It's not their job to command this war. Its the job of the commander-in-chief or his generals. If they want to end the war, defund it! They can do that, but they won't. If this doesn't convince you that the Democrats are power hungry, you are just plain blind.

A Taste of Universal Health Care

This is rich. Full article.

Cleaners at an NHS hospital with a poor record on superbugs have been told to turn over dirty sheets instead of using fresh ones between patients to save money.

Housekeeping staff at Good Hope Hospital in Sutton Coldfield, have been asked to re-use sheets and pillowcases wherever possible to cut a £500,000 laundry bill.

Posters in the hospital's linen cupboards and on doors into the A&E department remind workers that each item costs 0.275 pence to wash.

Is this what you Universal Health Care pushers are wanting? A health care system that can't afford to clean sheets?

It's amazing how little Americans know about health care in other countries. Citizens think that if health care becomes government run everything will remain the same, except it will be free. What America doesn't realize is our health is so great because the government doesn't run it!

Look at the post office, look at our public schools, look at government health care now (medicare and medicade which experts think will be bankrupt by 2020), look at social security (bankrupt by 2075). Every time our government touches something, they make it worse and it will happen if Hillary gets her way. Just like when her husband gave more power to the Department of Education.

Just ask any Canadian, "What happens when one of your citizens gets cancer?" The reply? "They go to the US for treatment."

Rosie Leaves The View

I have to be honest with you. I really don't care. I have never liked Rosie O'Donnell and probably never will. She's a loud mouth Liberal who view her own opinion as the only opinion that can ever exist. In the year that she was on The View, she brought nothing to the show aside from her own Liberal views and proceeded to chew up and spit out any of the girls that disagreed with her--and not by debating the subject, but by not allowing the opposition to talk.

There are many speculations for why Rosie isn't coming back. I think Barbara Walters is tired of either having to clean up after Rosie, or is jealous that Rosie is stealing the spot light on, what's supposed to be, her show.

At any rate, good ridden.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confesses to 9/11

I know this is old news, but I have to put it up here.

New transcripts released by the Pentagon show that the man considered to be the chief mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has admitted he is responsible for the terrorist attacks from “a to z”.

Mohammed has also acknowledged being responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, as well as other attempted terrorist attacks around the world in the years since.

The confessions come from a transcript of a hearing held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Saturday in which the Al Qaeda terrorist also acknowledged a plot to assassinate Bill Clinton while the former president was visiting the Philippines in 1994. The transcripts also show Mohammed admitted to plotting the October 2002 terrorist attack in Bali, Indonesia.

The admissions came during what was the first military hearing for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and 13 other major detainees since they were transferred last September from a secret CIA prison overseas into military custody at Guantanamo Bay.

He went before what is known as a Combatant Status Review Tribunal, the first step toward a possible war crimes trial.

Mohammed was captured in Pakistan four years ago.

Take that you moronic conspiracy theorist.

Source: Fox News, CNN

Army Ranger's Plea

I enjoy listening to the Neal Boortz show. He may be insensitive, but he is honest and that's a lot more than you can say for some Liberals.

On his show one day, he had an army ranger, who was on leave from Iraq, call Neal's show and poured out his heart. I can't describe his testimony, but I have to be honest, I almost cried.

Have a listen

PS: There is a little advertisement from a website on the scream client. Let it play, sit tight and Vicks testimony is next.

PBS Caves In to Islamic Fear

"Islam vs. Islamists: Voices from the Muslim Center" highlights the work of moderate Muslims who oppose the Islamist agenda and are willing to speak out. PBS officials decided against airing the film, which PBS's Robert MacNeil told the Diane Rehm Show earlier this month was "one-sided" and "alarmist."

Full article

You read that right. PBS is too scared to show a documentary in which Muslims, who live in America, speak out against Islamic Fasicist that want to set up Islamic "side laws" in America.

To give you an example of this "side law", cab drivers in New York City are required to pick up anyone that wants a ride from the airport (can't be racists or w/e). Islamic cab drivers--and there are a lot of them--want a special law in place that will allow them to "decline service" to anyone carrying alcohol.

The best part of all this is PBC's statement of "one-sided." This is the same station that is about to broadcast a documentary by Bill Moyers saying that Conservative stars like Hannity, Limbaugh, and O'Rilley are slime. Is PBS showing a hint of Liberism?

Democrats Ignore Constitution as well as the President

I've said before that the Democrats--namely the Democratic congress that is in effect right now--are traitors. There is no way of getting around it, they are traitors to this country every time they undermine the authority of the President. Finding examples of this is everywhere. Just look at what surfaced today.

Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa. was being interviewed on a cable news show, when asked to respond to Bush saying that Congress "shouldn't be micromanaging the war" this is what he had to say:

That's our job. It's time for [Bush] to get a redeployment plan. If he doesn't do that, we're going to have the disaster he predicts. ... I think the surge has failed.

Let me put this as plainly as possible, NO IT ISN'T! According to Article II, section 2 of our constitution--remember that document Democrats--it says:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States[.]

Are you starting to get it now? Not only are the Democrats blatantly disregarding the wishes of the Commander in Chief to fund the war, they also are disregarding the constitution. Who do these people think they are? I've already stated who I think they are.

Let's not forget though, the Democrats can stop all of this. Democrats have the power to defund the war. They can end it! But they won't. Why? Because defunding the troops, no matter how much you believe in the cause of ending this war, is bad 'PR'. The Democrats aren't a party of principle. They have no principles. The only reason they want to end this war is because there is a large number of people out there, that they think, are tired of this war--it can be argued they are tired of seeing us lose, which is all the liberal media will show them. The Democrats are doing this to buy votes, and outright denying funds to the armed forces might lose them some of those votes. Absolutely sickening.

Hillary Against School Voucher System

There is a problem with education in this country. Our kids tests scores are among the lowest in the world. Kids are trapped in failing schools, with no way of getting out. Who do we have to thank for this? Well, better write two letters; one to the Democrats and one to the Teachers Unions. These two groups are the reason why kids are failing.

Democrats have pushed for schools not to hold and/or fail kids anymore. Forget about the fact that the kid doesn't understand any of the material that he is supposed to know before he passes to the next grade, if you hold him back, it will hurt his self-esteem.

Parents have been pushing for vouchers for their students. With these vouchers, the parents and the students can decide what school that their child will attend. Teachers Unions have fought this for years because this will cause competition between teachers. How is this bad? Competing teachers will weed out the bad teachers and you'll nothing but good teachers left, not to mention teachers will have to come up with more interesting and intuitive ways of teaching. Teachers Unions don't want competition because it will cause teachers to do their job. HOW HORRIBLE!

Let me help you out Mrs. Clinton. First of all, you said these vouchers are taxpayer dollars. What part of giving taxpayer money to taxpayers do you not like? Aren't you the person that is pushing for universal health care and welfare for those "less fortunate." If you are a person that stands behind her principles, you should have no problem with giving away that money.

Second, how about we make a list of schools that people can send their child too. As long as the school of jihad and white supremacy pass the state standard curriculum, they get on the list and the parents can do what they want!

That is part of the problem people. Democrats don't want you to make your on decisions. They want you to rely on them for your problems. And when the government is the only one that can solve all your problems, you are no longer free.

Accusing Bush of an Agenda

Let's get away from religion and get back to Liberals. Unlike Liberals who have no drive to look into or debate opposing view points, I read Liberal writers and papers to find out what these people think. I came across one author, Deborah White, at about.com that not only obscures the truth to point out conservative agendas that aren't there, she is blind to the fact that her own party has a much more clear agenda.

Here is a quote from her latest article at about.com:

After the panel discussion, I asked Dr. Korb if the whispers were true that in winter 2007-08, President Bush and Congressional Republicans plan to declare the "surge" a success and pull large numbers of U.S. troops out of Iraq... just in time to positively affect the 2008 presidential election.

His response? Absolutely! They may not declare success, but they will time withdrawal of some troops to impact the presidential race.

An amazing assumption, but is it just me or can she not see past her on Liberal agenda far enough to see her own party can be more easily accused of this?

The Democratic congress has be fighting tooth and nail with the President to get him to accept a bill with a pull out date for the troops. Why, I ask you, if the Democrats believe that it is their duty to bring troops home, do they put a date in for pull out in 2008?

WHY!?! Because if they do that, when the troops come home they can say, "We did that. We brought your sons and daughters home. Vote for me!" Bush hasn't said anything about an agenda to bring troops home in 2008 to buy votes--he hasn't said anything about bringing them home--, but the Democrats have, at least, said half of that statement.

Hillary and Barack have have blatantly changed their dialect when speaking to minor groups in order to buy their votes. Do you really think that they would not use something as huge as bringing troops home to their advantage? Give me a break...

Do Homosexuals Fear Christians?

I posted on what I think Christians think of homosexuals, but let's take a quick look at the other side. In the article GOD TO SAME-SEXERS: "HURRY UP!", the author brought up a very good point:

Gay activist John McKellar has stated: "The major media are all nonstop advertisements for the gay lifestyle, so how far are they prepared to go in denying free speech to Christians, Muslims, and Jews?

Schools and TV were once non-bias toward all subjects and showed all viewpoints. That is far from the case today. It's okay to push homosexual acceptance and push that evolutionism is a science--which its not. But say a prayer, read the Bible, or voice your believe in God and you are persecuted for your beliefs. Who do we have to thank? Political Correctness.

It's okay that somebody is offended by a prayer, but don't think of being offended by a public display of gay affection. Totally hypocritical to expect to be appeased when someone offends you, but when you offend someone, that person should quit hating and get over it.

Can you guess which political party pushed such a blatant, hypocritical agenda? Well let's just say its not the Republican or the Libertarian party.